What is the term for the examination of prospective jurors by attorneys?

What is the term for the examination of prospective jurors by attorneys?

• A. Direct examination
• B. Voir dire
• C. Cross examination
• D. Discovery

Answer: (B)

The term for the examination of prospective jurors by attorneys is voir dire. This process allows attorneys to question potential jurors to assess their suitability for serving on a jury for a particular case. During voir dire, attorneys seek to identify any biases, preconceived notions, or conflicts of interest that may affect a juror's ability to render a fair and impartial verdict. The objective of this examination is to ensure that the jury selected is objective and can fairly consider the evidence presented in the trial. This is a critical phase in the trial process as it helps uphold the integrity of the judicial system by ensuring that jurors are fit for their role in the case. The other terms listed do not pertain to the juror examination. Direct examination refers to the initial questioning of a witness by the party that called them to testify. Cross-examination follows, where an opposing attorney questions that same witness to challenge their testimony. Discovery is a pre-trial procedure in which parties exchange information relevant to the case to prepare for trial. Each of these processes plays a distinct role in litigation but does not involve the examination of jurors like voir dire does.

The term for the examination of prospective jurors by attorneys is voir dire. This process allows attorneys to question potential jurors to assess their suitability for serving on a jury for a particular case. During voir dire, attorneys seek to identify any biases, preconceived notions, or conflicts of interest that may affect a juror's ability to render a fair and impartial verdict.

The objective of this examination is to ensure that the jury selected is objective and can fairly consider the evidence presented in the trial. This is a critical phase in the trial process as it helps uphold the integrity of the judicial system by ensuring that jurors are fit for their role in the case.

The other terms listed do not pertain to the juror examination. Direct examination refers to the initial questioning of a witness by the party that called them to testify. Cross-examination follows, where an opposing attorney questions that same witness to challenge their testimony. Discovery is a pre-trial procedure in which parties exchange information relevant to the case to prepare for trial. Each of these processes plays a distinct role in litigation but does not involve the examination of jurors like voir dire does.