Which of the following best defines "quasi judicial"?

Which of the following best defines "quasi judicial"?

• A. Fully judicial with complete authority
• B. Part judicial, of judicial character
• C. Not related to judicial processes
• D. Judicial only in appellate cases

Answer: (B)

The term "quasi judicial" refers to actions or decisions that have some characteristics of a judicial process but do not possess full judicial authority. This typically applies to bodies or agencies that have the power to make decisions on certain legal matters, often involving the application of laws or regulations, yet are not courts in the formal sense. For example, administrative agencies may hold hearings, make findings of fact, and adjudicate disputes in a manner similar to courts. In contrast, the other definitions do not accurately capture the essence of quasi judicial. The notion of being "fully judicial with complete authority" suggests a level of power and formal judicial processes that quasi judicial entities do not have. Being "not related to judicial processes" fundamentally misrepresents the term since quasi judicial implies a relationship to judicial activities. Lastly, being "judicial only in appellate cases" narrows the definition and does not encompass the broader nature of quasi judicial functions applicable in various situations beyond just appeals. Hence, being "part judicial, of judicial character" is the most fitting description for quasi judicial.

The term "quasi judicial" refers to actions or decisions that have some characteristics of a judicial process but do not possess full judicial authority. This typically applies to bodies or agencies that have the power to make decisions on certain legal matters, often involving the application of laws or regulations, yet are not courts in the formal sense. For example, administrative agencies may hold hearings, make findings of fact, and adjudicate disputes in a manner similar to courts.

In contrast, the other definitions do not accurately capture the essence of quasi judicial. The notion of being "fully judicial with complete authority" suggests a level of power and formal judicial processes that quasi judicial entities do not have. Being "not related to judicial processes" fundamentally misrepresents the term since quasi judicial implies a relationship to judicial activities. Lastly, being "judicial only in appellate cases" narrows the definition and does not encompass the broader nature of quasi judicial functions applicable in various situations beyond just appeals. Hence, being "part judicial, of judicial character" is the most fitting description for quasi judicial.